Why a Fiduciary Advisor Matters
You’ve spent decades building towards financial freedom. If you’re basing critical financial decisions on the advice you’re receiving, it’s worth knowing why that advice was given to you. A popular question has popped up in the last decade. It goes something like this, “Is the average person worse off after working with a financial advisor?” As piercing as that question is, it speaks volumes on the difference between good and bad advice.
Who does your Advisor work for?
The answer to this question can determine the value of the advice you’re receiving. More poignantly, it can tell you why your advisor recommended what he recommended. Historically, there are three basic ways a “financial advisor” can structure themselves.
A couple of years ago, my wife and I found out I was diagnosed with cancer. There isn’t necessarily a great time to find out you have cancer. But I can assure you that two weeks after your wife has a third child (the oldest of which just turned four), is not the ideal time. Fortunately, it was treatable and even curable. As you can imagine, the treatment was not fun, but it was effective.
Now imagine that a doctor diagnoses you with a similar disease. It’s curable. Things are looking good. As long as you have excellent care, you’ll get right back to normal. The only thing standing between you and excellent health is a trustworthy doctor to give you the advice and treatment plan you need.
If your doctor was under the Broker model that many financial advisors use, imagine the consequences. Your doctor would have several different treatment options, all of which would pay him a different commission. Let’s say these options pay the doctor somewhere between $500 and $50,000. Now to make it even more similar to financial advice, let’s imagine that the treatments paying the doctor $500 are widely recognized as the best course of action. They stand up under academic scrutiny. There are mountains of evidence that they are far more effective, and less harmful (!), than the treatments that would pay the doctor tens of thousands of dollars. But your doctor is a broker. He is not interested in a $500 commission. He wants, even needs, a commission that is several times that amount. And the $50,000 treatment might kind of work anyway, so what’s the big deal? Not to mention, there are thousands of others all over America that have been selling the $50,000 treatment for decades! It can’t be that bad, right?
Now let’s imagine that your doctor is #2-a hybrid. He is both a fiduciary and a broker all at the same time. Back to the doctor analogy, he or she can tell you with a straight face that they’re under the Hippocratic Oath. They can tell you they’re going to act in your best interests. But, your doctor is also licensed to sell medical treatments that are far more harmful and can collect the commission from them. Your doctor doesn’t disclose to you exactly when he’s acting as a broker and when he’s a fiduciary. How are you supposed to know when he’s working in your best interests vs. his own?
Note: The majority of Americans working with a financial advisor today are working with a hybrid. In many cases, the client doesn’t even know their advisor is also a broker.
What if there was a better way? What if you could simply pay your doctor a fee. Pay him for his expertise. Pay him to plan a course of treatment that was not just one of 10 different options that could be legally construed as “suitable.” You would pay him to give you the treatment plan that was in your best interests. One that was catered specifically to you and no one else. And would it end up being the $500 option or the $50,000 option? Well, your doctor wouldn’t have any vested interest in the cost. He’s not going to see a penny from the treatment; he’s already paid by you. So, he is free to pick the treatment option that is academically sound and has the best odds of getting you exactly what you need. Did we just solve health care?
Why is this better for you? It means your advisor has to take responsibility for the advice he or she gives. When you work with a fee-only fiduciary, the advisor isn’t settling for one of 20 options that could be construed as “suitable.” The fee-only advisor is searching for the one option that is in your best interests. The fee-only advisor is not holding themselves out to the public as advice-givers while appearing before courtrooms claiming they’re not in the advice business. The fee-only advisor hasn’t lobbied Congress for the last decade to ensure they can continue operating this way.
How does this play itself out with your finances?
John Bogle, the founder of Vanguard, famously said that in investing you don’t get what you pay for. You get what you don’t pay for. Here are the most common ways that bad advice can impact your portfolio.
If you have either of these products, it’s essential to assess how to transition them to a much lower cost alternative without triggering a large tax bill.
One of the primary jobs of a financial planner is to guide your decision making. When you make the right decisions, you compound your returns in a positive way for decades. Wrong decisions can both destroy your returns and increase your tax bill. Ensuring that the advice you get is structured to help you instead of your advisor is a wise first step.
Contact us if you are looking for an advisor!
We aim to be the single best option available for the small number of families we serve
Talk with a Brownlee Advisor